The Council of State (“COS”) published a draft bill (“Bill”) to amend the Copyright Act B.E. 2537 (1994) as amended by the Copyright Acts No. 2 B.E. 2558 (2015), No. 3 B.E. 2558 (2015) and No. 4 B.E. 2561 (2018) (“CA”) for public hearings from 10 to 30 September 2019.
The Bill proposes replacing the current “take-down notice” against online copyright infringement with a “notice and takedown” approach similar to that of the US Digital Millennium Copyright Act (“DMCA”). This new approach will reduce the current safe harbour exemption for Internet Service Providers (”ISP”) with respect to online copyright infringement committed by users of their platforms. ISPs will be required to undertake a greater role in the enforcement process. The proposed notice and takedown approach operates as follows:
(1) ISPs are exempt from liability if they have implemented and published policies and practices which terminate the provision of their services to users of their platforms who repeatedly infringe copyright. This applies to four types of ISPs which provide the following types of services: (1) mediums to transfer computer data via automatic means; (2) temporary computer data storage; (3) computer data deposit; and (4) internet search.
(2) ISPs who have been notified by copyright owners of any allegedly infringing data must promptly take down or suspend the computer data, its reference source or access point from their computer system or network and notify the user who posted the allegedly infringing material.
(3) Users who have been notified under (2) above may raise an opposition by counter-notifying the ISP. This will then oblige the ISP to restore the allegedly infringing data within 15 days from the date of the counter-notification except in case where the copyright owner has notified the ISP that it has filed a lawsuit to prosecute the user.
(4) Any person who falsely notifies an ISP of any alleged copyright infringing data which causes the data or its reference source or access point to be removed or suspended from the platform of the ISP or restored is liable for any damages arising out of his or her false notification or opposition.
After the public hearings, the COS may further revise the Bill, taking into account the comments, views and suggestions made by the public and then return the Bill to Government for submitting to Parliament for readings.
- Managing Partner | bangkok
- Coordinator |
The information provided in this document is general in nature and may not apply to any specific situation. Specific advice should be sought before taking any action based on the information provided. Under no circumstances shall LawPlus Ltd. and LawPlus Myanmar Ltd. or any of their directors, partners and lawyers be liable for any direct or indirect, incidental or consequential loss or damage that results from the use of or the reliance upon the information contained in this document. Copyright © 2016 to 2020 LawPlus Ltd.